The restraining order was issued by M.A. Hassan, the presiding judge, on Thursday.
In the suit marked FCT/HC/CV/GAR/41/2022, filed by the Incorporated Trustees of Forum for Accountability and Good Leadership, the court had, on December 19, granted an ex parte application restraining the respondents from arresting and detaining the CBN governor.
EFCC COUNTERS DSS
In a counter affidavit filed in response to the suit, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), listed as one of the respondents, had said it had no case against Emefiele as he is not under investigation by the commission.
The anti-graft commission, which was joined as the fifth respondent in the suit, submitted that there is a process for the removal of the CBN governor, thus the “continued harassment” and interference by the fourth respondent (DSS) is “embarrassing” in the light of statutory provisions
Consequently, the anti-graft agency asked the court to discharge it from the matter on the ground that it is not a necessary party.
‘HARASSMENT OVER TRUMPED-UP ALLEGATIONS IS ILLEGAL’
Delivering the judgment on Thursday, the FCT high court judge held that the DSS did not substantiate or provide any material fact of terrorism.
The judge held that “the continuous harassment, threat, intimidation, restriction of free movement and abuse of the rights of Godwin Emeffele, governor of Central Bank of Nigeria, over trumped-up allegations of terrorism financing and fraudulent practices, etc., by the 4th Respondent and their officers are vindictive, unwarranted, abrasive, oppressive and same constitutes a flagrant breach of his rights to personal liberty, dignity of human person, right to policy making powers freedom of thought, conscience and religion and movement as respectively provided and enshrined under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as Amended) and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act and, therefore, unconstitutional and illegal”.
The judge also held “that the 4th respondent acted wrongfully and illegally in instigating the president of the federal republic of Nigeria against Emefiele in respect of the exercise of his statutory duty relating to the issuance of monetary policies and directives in the interest of national security and economy”.
Consequently, the court restrained the DSS from further arresting, intimidating, inviting, harassing, instigating, interrogating, or detaining the CBN governor.
The court also held that all other respondents, except the DSS, are nominal parties as no case was really made against them.
Hassan also said the applicant had shown sufficient locus standi to initiate the suit in line with fundamental human rights rules.
The court also held that it would not award damages as the suit was not taken out by Emefiele himself.
